Saturday, August 24, 2013

Split Brain Patients and Organization of the Brain

Commissurotomy or split-brain patients have helped scientists understand the lateralization of the brain; that the right and left halves of the brain are different and provide the ability to function for different tasks. Additionally, it has raised questions as well as provided insight into how and where in the brain individuals maintain a sense of self (Uddin, 2011). Split brain patients have had a portion or the entirety of their corpus callosum surgically severed (Breedlove, Watson, & Rosenzweig, 2010). From studying these individuals, it becomes apparent that each hemisphere has varying responsibility in "cognitive, perceptual, emotional, and motor activities" (Breedlove et al., 2010, p. 605). For example, when words are presented to the left visual field of split-brain patients, the words cannot be repeated verbally (Breedlove et al., 2010). It becomes evident that when the corpus callosum is severed, the two brain halves do not function in tandem, but separately, although not like conjoined twins.

 Similarities and Differences: Split Brain Patients and Conjoined Twins  
Conjoined craniopagus twins are quite rare and can be connected at different parts of the head and brain (Sudha, Dev, Kamble, & Joseph, 2009). For Tatiana and Krista, they shared the thalamus, which is a control center for the brain (MacQueen, 2011). All craniopagus twins share at least a part of the brain, and split brain patients work at trying to share two halves of one brain. Further, some types of conjoined twins and split brain patients may experience two minds sharing one body.

On the other hand, some conjoined twins have two distinct brains and the two work together to make their shared body perform correctly. This is the case with the Hensel twins who basically, share a body but have separate heads and brains (Wallace & Doman, 1996: Weathers, 2007). Split-brain patients may not be as fortunate in that the two halves of their brains may not work together at all, leaving the individual with a less than definitive sense of self. Conjoined twins, with separate brains are able to communicate with each other and this is the primary and most distinct loss caused by a commissurotomy. After this procedure, the two halves of the brain lose the ability to function as one because of the brain's inability to communicate with its other half. Further, most of the time, split-brain patients are the result of a surgical intervention, however conjoined twinning is a natural, albeit rare, occurance.

The Meaning of Personhood

At first I thought about the words of Rene Descartes, 'I think, therefore I am'. Then, however, I thought about some of my severely developmentally delayed clients with little to no ability to cognitively process, let alone engage in a conscious and complex self-perception. Yet, no one would dare say they are not people. So, even the act of thinking does not a person make. That said, it is provocative to read and think about the discussion of conjoined twins and split brain patients and what it means to be a person. It certainly initiates conversation about the singularity of personhood (Greenwood, 1993). Additionally, it raises questions about the existence of sense of self and the role of the brain in that perception. Even the idea of personhood necessitating a sense of self is not sufficient, for a sense of self can be lacking in severely intellectually disabled individuals, but they are still people.

Perhaps one of the most interesting questions raised in the discussion of split-brain patients and conjoined twins are those that question the almost arcane nature of the brain. It can become separate enough in split-brain patients to render an individual uncertain of his or her personhood. And yet, a brain can share one small part in conjoined twins that somehow facilitates an almost extra sensory ability for one twin to perceive something through the eyes of the other.


Greenwood, J. D. (1993). Split-Brains And Singular Personhood [Abstract]. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 31(3), 285-306. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.1993.tb01722.x  MacQueen, K. (2011). Tatiana and Krista go to school. Maclean’s, 124(39), 26–27.

Norton, A., Zipse, L., Marchina, S. & Schlaug, G. (2009). Melodic intonation therapy: shared insights on how it is done and why it might help. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 431–436.
Peterson, G. R. (2004). Do Split Brains Listen to Prozac?. Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science, 39(3), 555-576. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9744.2004.t01-1-00601.x.

Sudha, L., Dev, B., Kamble, R., & Joseph, S. (2009). Role of biplane digital subtraction angiography, and 3D rotational angiography in craniopagus twins: A case report, detailed pictorial evaluation, and review of literature. Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences, 4(2), 113–116.
Uddin, L. Q. (2011). Brain connectivity and the self: The case of cerebral disconnection. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(1), 94–98.

The Body's Response to Stress

The experience of emotions are bodily reactions - intrinsic emergency responses that instigate the fight or flight response (Breedlove, Watson, & Rosenzweig, 2010). It is one component of our biology that helps us adapt to our environment. In many cases, a change in the environment requires an immediate response for the purposes of maintaining safety. The human body has intrinsic mechanisms, such as hormonal and other responses that place the body in an optimum state in which the individual can fight, flight, or respond in another appropriate way. For example, cortisol plays a role in attending to bodily functions so energy is regulated toward the threat at hand (Breedlove et al., 2010).

Two Ways Stress Responses Are Normally Counteracted
Individuals can consciously work toward counteracting the body's stress response by exercising the body and the brain. Exercise increases a buffering effect that takes place in the brain (Stress-defeating effects of exercise traced to emotional brain circuit, 2011). Ameliorating stress can be accomplished through other relaxation techniques used in martial arts, dance, yoga, or pilates. Exercise can create a richness of environment that appears to foster resilience (Lehmann & Herkenham, 2010). In trying to understand the neurological basis to resilience, Lehmann and Herkenham (2011) found the quality of environments of mice were predictive of resiliency in less than optimal social circumstances. When the mice were housed in a rich environment in which they could exercise and explore, they exhibited less anxiety, depression, and social avoidance after experiencing socially unpleasant circumstances. The rich environment produced a greater level of emotional regulation and reward processing (Lehmann & Herkenham, 2011).

The body works toward homeostasis as well. Through the release of hormones and steroids from the adrenal cortex, the body works to suppress some immunological responses. As mentioned above, cortisol regulates bodily functions to conserve energy for the body to use when flight or fight responses are necessary.

Individual Differences in Recovery from Stress

Individuals respond and recover from stress according to their biology and psychological state of well being. Cognitive reappraisal, too, may play a considerable role in emotional regulation, which allows individuals to utilize an ability to assess situations as less threatening and challenging (Troy, Wilhelm, Shallcross, & Mauss, 2010). This helps individuals to experience stress differently, or experience less stress (Troy et al, 2010). Long-term chronic stress can lead to a number of negative consequences. For example, Brown et al. (2010) found when children had chronically stressful childhoods, they were more apt to initiate smoking behavior. Smoking is linked to an increased risk of lung cancer. Additionally, Brown et al. found stress altered the brain areas that respond to stress. The field of psychoneuroimmunology holds a belief that psychological challenges and stressors that affect the nervous system also affect the immune system. Cohen, Tyrell, & Smith (1991) found that stress increased vulnerability to upper respiratory infections and colds. As medicine and psychology move toward individualized service, it becomes more important to understand the way individuals cope, their personality type, and their genetic predisposition. Specialized strategies could lead to personalized stress management giving individuals the ability to surmount psychological stress and its physical/biological negative effects (Buckley, 2011; Zozulya, Gabaeva, Sokolov, Surkina, & Kost, 2008).


Breedlove, S. M., Watson, N. V., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2010). Biological psychology: An introduction to behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. (6th ed.) Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers.

Brown, D. W., Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., Edwards, V. J., Malarcher, A., Croft, J. B., & Giles, W. H. (2010). Adverse childhood experiences are associated with the risk of lung cancer: A prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-20

Buckley, R. (2011). Infectious Disease Genomics: Individual Variability, New Opportunities. MD Conference Express, 4-5.

Cohen. S,. Tyrrell, U. & Smith, A. (1991). Psychological stress and susceptibility to the common cold. New England journal of Medicine,325, 606-612.

Lehmann, M., & Herkenham, M. (2011). Environmental enrichment confers stress resiliency to social defeat through an infralimbic cortex-dependent neuroanatomical pathway. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(16), 6159–6173. doi: 10.1523/​JNEUROSCI.0577-11.2011

Troy, A. S., Wilhelm, F. H., Shallcross, A. J., & Mauss, I. B. (2010). Seeing the silver lining: Cognitive reappraisal ability moderates the relationship between stress and depressive symptoms. Emotion, 10(6), 783-795. doi:10.1037/a0020262

Stress-Defeating effects of exercise traced to emotional brain circuit. (2011). Bethesda, Maryland, US: US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH).

Zozulya, A., Gabaeva, M., Sokolov, O., Surkina, I., & Kost, N., (2008). Personality, coping style, and constitutional neuroimmunology. Journal Of Immunotoxicology, 5(2), 221-225.doi:10.1080/15476910802131444

Smoking Addiction and Cessation

Smoking is the leading preventable cause of poor health outcomes, and although the rate of smoking behavior has decreased in the last decade, a considerable number of individuals begin smoking each year (Godtfredsen & Prescott, 2011). Approximately 23% of men and 19% of women in the United States smoke (Audrain-McGovern & Benowitz, 2011), and more than 400,000 individuals die prematurely from smoking-related diseases. Globally, 6 million people die prematurely from smoking related illnesses (Godtfredsen & Prescott, 2011). Although the risks of this behavior are well-established, and for the most part, understood by most smokers, smoking addiction and the attitudes surrounding this issue remain difficult to change (Ansell, Gu, Tuit, & Sinha, 2012).

The initiation of smoking behavior has several psychological and biological antecedents such as a biological predisposition to addictive behavior, depression, and general lack of psychological well-being. Smoking addiction as well as smoking cessation have powerful effects on biological and psychological systems. The goal of this paper is to identify and explicate the effects of smoking addiction and smoking cessation on appetite, stress, and physical and psychological health.

                                        The Effects of Smoking Addiction

Heishman (1999) described smoking addiction as a "complex process that involves biological, psychological, behavioral, and cultural factors" (p. 143). It has intense biological effects on individuals. When addicted smokers are deprived of nicotine, the effects include cognitive impairments as well as a deficit in attention span (Heishman, 1999). The confluence of complex factors involved in smoking addiction are involved in the maintenance of the compulsive and repetitive use of tobacco, although it remains a challenge to determine exactly how these mechanisms combine in a biologically and psychologically unique individual.

For smokers, nicotine is a way to regulate behavior (Heishman, 1999). Although smokers may not completely understand the mechanisms by which this takes place, research has shown that the reinforcing effects begin within the brain (Heishman, 1999). Research has determined that the dopaminergic system mediates the reinforcing effects of nicotine as well as other drugs, although the confluence of biological, psychological, cultural, and behavioral processes by which reinforcement encourages addictive behavior is a complex process.
The Effects of Smoking Addiction on Appetite

Some smokers claim they smoke for weight control because it decreases their appetite (Mineur et al., 2011). The mechanisms by which this decrease takes place are neurobiological, but not well understood until the last several years. Mineur et al., (2011) discovered the hypothalamic melancortin system played a significant role in nicotine's tendency to decrease body weight and the amount of food consumed. Furthermore, the neurotransmission of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors were involved as well (Mineur et al., 2011).

Rodent studies have shown that nicotine decreases hunger and food intake (Jessen, Buemann, Toubro, Skovgaard, & Astrup, 2004). The decrease is caused by changes in neurotransmitters located in the hypothalamus. Additionally, the dopaminergic and serotonergic systems in the hypothalamus become activated. These studies have been especially pertinent for designing strategies to help smokers prevent weight gain during smoking cessation (Jessen et al., 2004). Many smokers do not quit because they anticipate weight gain, and according to some health care providers, the weight gain that follows smoking cessation counteracts some aspects of the benefit of quitting (Audrain-MCGovern & Benowitz, 2011).

Weight control is a commonly reported reason for smoking, especially for women (Copeland & Carney, 2003). Although women smokers believe their smoking behavior helps curb their appetite and control their weight, most of these women report they want to quit smoking by utilizing a program that would help them quit and not gain weight. Copeland & Carney (2003) found women who generally ate a better diet and had more self-control over their food consumption relied on smoking less than the women who has less self-control over their diet.

The Effects of Smoking Addiction on Stress
When smokers experience stress, they are more likely to want to smoke, and they smoke more. One common belief about smoking is that it relieves stress, although no scientific evidence exists to prove it (Heishman, 1999). Smokers, however, smoke more when they are experiencing stress. Cumulative stress, however, has an effect on the initiation of smoking behavior (Brown, Lewinsohn, Seeley, & Wagner, 1996). Utilizing the stress-vulnerability model of addiction, Ansell et al. (2012) found that environmental circumstances, specifically cumulative stress results in individuals losing self-control as well as increases their ability to regulate impulsivity. Further, research has determined that cumulative stress is a risk factor that increases individuals' susceptibility to a number of addictive behaviors (Sinha, 2008). The mechanism by which stress increases this susceptibility may be through a loss of self-efficacy, social support, and sense of control (Stewart, Greaves, Kushner, Letourneau, Spitzer, & Boscoe, 2011).

When studying smoking behavior and post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the severity of the PTSD did not affect smoking intensity, although smoking seemed to effect the individual by the mechanism of emotional numbing (Joseph et al., 2012). The numbing is thought to be somewhat of a self-medication utilized to separate oneself from the stress of recalling traumatic experience (Joseph et al., 2012). In some individuals, especially those with PTSD and other psychiatric disorders, nicotine can be important for the individual's ability to manage their stress with emotional numbing. Because of the personal antecedents of smoking and the various reactions to stress as it relates to smoking behavior, the effects of smoking on stress can be varied and indeterminable without individualized scrutiny (Joseph et al., 2012).

An abundance of research established the association between stress and smoking initiation and continued smoking. In adolescents, an increase in initiating smoking behavior is associated with risk factors that include depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and attention deficit disorder (Anda et al., 1990; Brown et al., 1996; Hockenberry et al., 2011). When studying the association between stress and smoking, research found that life stress was indeed provocative for smoking behavior, and work stress was complicit in creating stress as well, but not to the extent that life situations created stress (Cui, Rockett, Yang, & Cao, 2012; Nelson, Yi, Sorensen, & Berkman, 2012). Addicted smokers perceive stress as the single most influential reason that they smoke. Because they believe their smoking behavior ameliorates their stress, one of the primary reasons for avoiding smoking cessation is the concern that they will experience higher levels of stress (Hajek, Taylor, & McRobbie, 2010).

The Effects of Smoking Addiction on Health

Smoking addiction is the cause of death in more than 5.4 million individuals every year (Cui et al., 2012). Eighty percent of these deaths occur in undeveloped countries, such as China, which leads the world in tobacco consumption. Hajek, Taylor, and McRobbie (2010) suggested that smoking not only causes ill physical health, but may also cause psychological health deficits. Nicotine is known to cause powerful effects in the brain within 10 seconds of smoke inhalation (Duaso & Duncan, 2012). It causes the release of dopamine in the brain, which later, during abstinance, provokes a range of withdrawal symptoms such as irritability, inability to focus, headache, and nausea (Duaso & Duncan, 2012).

Smoking is known to increase the risk of respiratory disease. Further, it is the primary cause of almost 90% of all chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Shahab, Jarvis, Britton, & West, 2006). Smoking is the primary cause of cardiovascular disease and it increases the risk of coronary heart disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, atherosclerosis, and stroke (Duaso & Duncan, 2012). Smoking is the primary preventable cause of death in industrialized countries (Hooten et al., 2011). Although it has been shown to cause approximately 90% of all lung cancers, it causes a variety of other cancers as well, including oral cancer, cancer of the sinuses, esophagus, stomach, pancreas, liver, kidney, bladder, cervix, ureter, uterus, cervix, colon, and rectum, one type of ovarian cancer, and leukemia (Duaso & Duncan, 2012). It causes complications in pregnancy and long-term effects on the newborn, such as respiratory problems (Duaso & Duncan, 2012). Second hand-smoke is a danger to children and adults as well, and has been proven to cause long-term respiratory illness and increases the risk of heart disease (Duaso & Duncan, 2012). For women, smoking is associated with lower bone density and increases the risk of hip fractures.

In patients with chronic pain, smokers have greater levels of pain, more severe depression, anxiety, and take higher doses of prescription medications. Health outcomes for these patients are worse than for non-smokers (Hooten et al., 2011). Smoking plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of pain. Specifically, it provides a distraction for chronic pain patients, although overall, these patients were not as healthy as non-smokers, and did not respond to pain management as well as did non-smokers (Hooten et al., 2011).

                                                The Effects of Smoking Cessation
The Effects of Smoking Cessation on Appetite

When smokers quit, they usually gain weight (Jessen et al., 2004). Within 6-12 months after smoking cessation, abstaining smokers gain an average of 12 pounds, but some gain more. African Americans older than 55 years and individuals in lower socio economic status tend to gain more weight than the average. Heavy smokers also gain more weight than the average smoker after smoking cessation (Audrain-MCGovern & Benowitz, 2011). Women concerned about gaining weight tend to gain approximately 17 pounds, which is more than the average (Levine, Cheng, Kalarchian, Perkins, & Marcus, 2012). Genetic factors too, may be partly culpable in causing more than average weight gain.

Weight gain during smoking cessation takes place because of several factors, but the primary reason was that abstaining smokers eat more than non-abstaining smokers (Cabanac & Frankham, 2002; Levine et al., 2012). Further, female smokers who remain abstinent were previously thought to intake excessive amounts of high carbohydrate snacks and fats (Hughes

& Hatsukami, 1997) or sweet foods (Rodin, 1987), although Levine et al. (2012) found no empirical evidence to support these findings. The appetite-suppressant characteristic of nicotine is well-known (Jessen et al., 2004). After smoking cessation, nicotine's effects on the brain are no longer in effect, so the individual experiences an increase in hunger. Further, food seems to be a replacement for the satisfaction derived from smoking, and when individuals struggled to maintain cigarette abstinence, they utilized food to obtain the same reward satisfaction previously provided by smoking (Spring, Pagoto, McCharque, Hedeker, & Werth, 2003). Further, they began to place higher value on carbohydrate-rich or more appealing snacks (Spring et al., 2003).

The Effects of Smoking Cessation on Stress

As previously discussed, no empirical evidence exists to support the idea that smoking relieves stress. If smoking relieved stress, smokers would likely experience added stress when they quit smoking, however Heishman (1999) found smokers reported less stress after quitting. Nicotine deprivation in addicted individuals typically causes an increase in stress, anxiety, and irritability (Hughes, Higgins, & Hatsukami, 1990). These negative experiences can cause mood swings between each cigarette smoked.

When measuring stress differences between smokers, and smokers who quit smoking, the individuals who had recently stopped smoking experienced less stress than the individuals who continued to be active smokers (Hajek, Taylor, & McRobbie, 2010). These findings suggested that although dependent smokers fear they will experience an inordinate amount of stress if they quit smoking, and they fear they they may lose the ability to cope with stress. Although smokers perceive smoking as a valuable tool for coping, smokers who recently quit experienced no such loss (Croghan, Schroeder, Hays, Eberman, Patten, & Berg, 2005; Hajek et al., 2010).

On the contrary, however, the process of smoking withdrawal produces a stressful state during the initial phase of smoking cessation. This stress can cause a failure to abstain during this vulnerable phase when quitting is first attempted. Wardle, Munafò, & de Wit (2011) found some evidence that suggests the withdrawal effects of smoking cessation affects individuals’ ability to respond to acute stress. Further, the effects of long-term use of nicotine causes neuroadaptations in the biological systems that respond to stress (Wardle, Munafò, & de Wit, 2011). This can leave a quitter vulnerable to stress without the normal ability to cope during smoking cessation attempts. This may be especially true when the withdrawal symptoms are strongest (Wardle, Munafò, & de Wit, 2011).

Most smokers blame stress and negative affect experiences for aborting smoking cessation attempts (Shiffman & Waters, 2004). However, they report feeling happier after quitting, and only 3% said they were not as happy since quitting (Shahab & West, 2013). This should counter any hesitations held by smokers, since the typical belief for the smoking population is that they are better able to control stress with smoking. As previously mentioned, no empirical evidence exists to suggest smoking relieves or diminishes stress (Heishman, 1999). Although a number of reasons may underpin why quitters report being happier after smoking cessation, although they may be less prone to the negative psychological behaviors and experiences of smokers (Shahab & West, 2013). In support of this hypothesis, research found smoking reduces anxiety and stress, and has not been shown to increase adverse psychological behaviors (West & Hajek, 1997).

The Effects of Smoking Cessation on Health

Smokers who quit had a significantly better quality of life after a year of being smoke free (Sales, Oliveira, Mattos, Viana, & Pereira, 2009; Tillmann & Silcock, 1997). Chronic pain patients believed nicotine was a valuable coping strategy, although these patients fared equally well with a form of distraction other than cigarette smoking (Hooten et al., 2011). When their perceptions were altered, they became more aware of the role of their smoking behavior and were able to consider smoking cessation (Hooten et al., 2011).

If smokers quit before the age of 35, they have little to no risk for tobacco-related illnesses or premature death, compared to individuals who have never smoked (Godtfredsen & Prescott, 2011). It has been well-established that nicotine addiction more than doubles the health risks for stroke, cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, abdominal aortic aneurism, and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (Godtfredsen & Prescott, 2011). After the cessation of smoking, the risk of continued cardiovascular disease is reduced significantly and quickly (Chow, Jolly, Rao-Melacini, Fox, Anand, & Yusuf, 2011). Within two to five years after smoking cessation, the risk of stroke decreases considerably, but not to the level of individuals who never smoked. Even after 15 years, smokers who have quit continue to have a somewhat higher risk factor for stroke (Godtfredsen & Prescott, 2011).

The risk for PAD at least doubles for smokers, but the risk decreases considerably after smoking cessation. The decrease, however, is much slower than that of coronary heart disease. Further, quitting smoking does not increase the distance an individual is able to walk with PAD (Godtfredsen & Prescott, 2011). The risk for abdominal aortic aneurism decreases to that of individuals who never smoked. The risk in smokers doubles (Godtfredsen & Prescott, 2011). With chronic lung diseases such as chronic obstructive lung disease, after smoking cessation individuals regained improvement in lung function and symptoms of respiratory illness. After 14 years, mortality risk was significantly reduced. This is not true for individuals with severe COPD, although the effects of quitting smoking have not been investigated in this population (Godtfredsen & Prescott, 2011).

It is well-recognized that smoking exacerbates symptoms of asthma. In addition, smoking reduces decreases the effects of inhaled corticosteroids. Although there is a paucity of research on the effects of smoking cessation on asthmatics, the few studies which have been done show improvements in lung function and asthmatic symptoms. Another study showed better quality of life, and a decrease in the use of rescue inhalants. One study showed that the damage done by smoking was reversed after smoking cessation (Godtfredsen & Prescott, 2011).


Although the benefits of smoking are limited to being little more than a perception of a distraction from pain, a catalyst for psychological numbing used to escape the experience of traumatic experience, and as a remedy for anxiety, the negative health outcomes of smoking addiction are well-established (Ansell, Gu, Tuit, & Sinha, 2012; Hajek, Taylor, & McRobbie, 2010). The effects of smoking addiction are far-reaching. According to health practitioners, as well as the opinion of the secular populace, perpetuate smoking is considered pandemic across the globe. Although most individuals understand the myriad of the health risks associated with smoking behavior, there remains a range of personal, social, and environmental factors that help perpetuate the behavior. The implications of smoking addiction charge a tremendous cost to the healthcare system, and some of the damage done is irreparable (Godtfredsen & Prescott, 2011). Smoking cessation is not without its challenge, although it can, and usually does, reduce the final toll of smoking on psychological and physical health (Sales, Oliveira, Mattos, Viana, & Pereira, 2009; Tillmann & Silcock, 1997).


Anda, R. F., Williamson, D. F., Escobedo, L. G., Mast, E. E., Giovino, G. A., & Remington, P. L. (1990). Depression and the dynamics of smoking. A national perspective. [Abstract]. Journal of the American Medical Association, 264(12), 1541-1545.

Ansell, E., Gu, P., Tuit, K., & Sinha, R. (2012). Effects of cumulative stress and impulsivity on smoking status. Human Psychopharmacology, 27(2), 200-208. doi:10.1002/hup.1269

Audrain-McGovern, J., & Benowitz, N. (2011). Cigarette smoking, nicotine, and body weight. Clinical Pharmacology And Therapeutics, 90(1), 164-168. doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.105

Brown, R. A., Lewinsohn, P. M., Seeley, J. R., & Wagner, E. F. (1996). Cigarette Smoking, Major Depression, and Other Psychiatric Disorders among Adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(12), 1602-1610. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199612000-00011

Cabanac, M., & Frankham, P. (2002). Evidence that transient nicotine lowers the body weight set point. Physiology & Behavior, 76(4-5), 539-542. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(02)00783-7

Chow CK, Jolly S, Rao-Melacini P, Fox KA, Anand SS, Yusuf S. (2010). Association of diet, exercise, and smoking modification with risk of early cardiovascular events after acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 121(6), 750–8.

Copeland, A. L., & Carney, C. E. (2003). Smoking expectancies as mediators between dietary restraint and disinhibition and smoking in college women. Experimental And Clinical Psychopharmacology, 11(3), 247-251. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.11.3.247

Croghan I. T., Schroeder, D. R., Hays J. T., Eberman, K. M., Patten, C. A., & Berg, E. J., (2005). Nicotine dependence treatment: perceived health status improvement with 1-year continuous smoking abstinence. European Journal of Public Health. 15(3) 251-255.

Cui, X., Rockett, I., Yang, T., & Cao, R. (2012). Work stress, life stress, and smoking among rural-urban migrant workers in China. BMC Public Health, 12979. doi:10.1186/1471- 2458-12-979

Duaso, M. J., & Duncan, D. (2012). Health impact of smoking and smoking cessation strategies: current evidence. British Journal Of Community Nursing, 17(8), 356-363.

Godtfredsen, N., & Prescott, E. (2011). Benefits of smoking cessation with focus on
cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities. Clinical Respiratory Journal, 5(4), 187-
194. doi:10.1111/j.1752-699X.2011.00262.x

Heishman, S. (1999). Behavioral and cognitive effects of smoking: relationship to nicotine addiction. Nicotine & Tobacco Research: Official Journal Of The Society For Research On Nicotine And Tobacco, 1 Suppl 2S143.

Hajek, P., Taylor, T., & McRobbie, H. (2010). The effect of stopping smoking on perceived stress levels. Addiction, 105(8), 1466-1471. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02979.x

Hockenberry, J. M., Timmons, E. J., & Vander Weg, M. W. (2011). Adolescent mental health as a risk factor for adolescent smoking onset. Adolescent Health, Medicine, and Therapeutics, 2, 27-35. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S11573

Hooten, W., Vickers, K. S., Shi, Y., Ebnet, K. L., Townsend, C. O., Patten, C. A., & Warner, D. O. (2011). Smoking Cessation and Chronic Pain: Patient and Pain Medicine Physician Attitudes. Pain Practice, 11(6), 552-563. doi:10.1111/j.1533-2500.2011.00462.x

Hughes, J. R., Higgins, S. T., & Hatsukami, D. (1990). Effects of abstinence from tobacco: A critical review. In: Koslowski et al., eds. Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems, vol. 10. New York: Plenum.

Jessen, A., Buemann, B., Toubro, S., Skovgaard, I., & Astrup, A. (2005). The appetite- suppressant effect of nicotine is enhanced by caffeine. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, 7(4), 327-333.

Joseph, A., McFall, M., Saxon, A., Chow, B., Leskela, J., Dieperink, M., & ... Beckham, J. (2012). Smoking intensity and severity of specific symptom clusters in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal Of Traumatic Stress, 25(1), 10-16. doi:10.1002/jts.21670

Levine, M. D., Cheng, Y., Kalarchian, M. A., Perkins, K. A., & Marcus, M. D. (2012). Dietary
intake after smoking cessation among weight-concerned women smokers. Psychology Of Addictive Behaviors, 26(4), 969-973. doi:10.1037/a0028948

Ludman, E. J., McBride, C. M., Nelson, J., Curry, S. J., Grothaus, L. C., Lando, H. A., & Pirie, P. L. (2000). Stress, depressive symptoms, and smoking cessation among pregnant women. Health Psychology, 19(1), 21-27. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.1.21

Nelson, C. C., Yi, L., Sorensen, G., & Berkman, L. F. (2012). Assessing the Relationship Between Work-Family Conflict and Smoking. American Journal Of Public Health, 102(9), 1767-1772. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300413

Mineur, Y. S., Abizaid, A., Rao, Y., Salas, R., DiLeone, R. J., Gundisch, D., ...Picciotto, M. R. (2011). Nicotine decreases food intake through activation of POMC neurons. Science 332(6035), 1330-1332. doi: 10.1126/science.1201889

Perkins, K. (1992). Effects of tobacco smoking on caloric intake. British Journal Of Addiction, 87(2), 193-205.

Rodin, J. (1987). Weight change following smoking cessation: The role of food intake and exercise. Addictive Behaviors, 12, 303–317. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(87)90045-1

Shahab, L. M., Jarvis, J., Britton, J. & West, R. (2006). Prevalence, diagnosis and relation to tobacco dependence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in a nationally representative population sample. Thorax 61(12). 1043-1047. doi:10.1136/thx.2006.064410

Shahab, L., & West, R. (2009). Do ex-smokers report feeling happier following cessation? Evidence from a cross-sectional survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11(5), 553-557.

Shiffman, S., & Waters, A. J. (2004). Negative Affect and Smoking Lapses: A Prospective Analysis. Journal Of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 72(2), 192-201. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.192

Sinha, R. (2008). Chronic Stress, Drug Use, and Vulnerability to Addiction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1141(1), 105-130. doi: 10.1196/annals.1441.030

Sales, M., Oliveira, M., Mattos, I., Viana, C., & Pereira, E. (2009). The impact of smoking cessation on patient quality of life. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, 35(5), 436-441. Retrieved August 04, 2013, from

Spring, B., Pagoto, S., McChargue, D., Hedeker, D. & Werth, J. (2003). Altered reward value of carbohydrate snacks for female smokers withdrawn from nicotine. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 76(2), 351-360.

Stewart, M. J., Greaves, L., Kushner, K., Letourneau, N. L., Spitzer, D. L., & Boscoe, M. (2011). Where There Is Smoke, There is Stress: Low-Income Women Identify Support Needs and Preferences for Smoking Reduction. Health Care For Women International, 32(5), 359-383. doi:10.1080/07399332.2010.530724

Tillmann M, & Silcock J. (1997). A comparison of smokers' and ex-smokers' health-related quality of life. Journal of Public Health Medicine, 19(3), 268-73.

Wardle, M., Munafò, M., & de Wit, H. (2011). Effect of social stress during acute nicotine abstinence. Psychopharmacology, 218(1), 39-48. doi:10.1007/s00213-010-2150-y

West , R. , & Hajek , P. ( 1997 ). What happens to anxiety levels on giving up smoking? The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(11), 1589-1592.

Stages of Sleep

The two main sleep cycles within which most mammals alternate are slow-wave sleep (SWS) and rapid eye movement sleep (REM). SWS is subdivided between four stages of sleep. Sleep stage 1 in which the heart rate slows and muscle tension decreases (Breedlove, Watson, & Rosenzweig, 2010). Stage 2 sleep is characterized by spindles (short bursts of brain energy) and cooling of the brain, and stage 3 sleep is characterized by the same spindles as in stage 2 sleep and delta waves characteristic of stage 4. Stage 4 is the deepest sleep stage and is characterized by delta waves at least 50% of the time. REM sleep is the stage in which people do most of their dreaming. Dreams in REM sleep are characteristically more vivid than the thinking dreams that take place in non-REM sleep.

Two Potential Effects of Sleep Deprivation
The effects of sleep deprivation have been referred to as bizarre behavior that has been likened to schizophrenia (Breedlove, Watson, & Rosenzweig, 2010). Chronic, and even short-term insomnia can alter an individual's ability to react appropriately (Colton & Altevogt, 2006). Ultimately, chronic long-term insomnia can damage the immune system and cause death, perhaps because of sleep destroying the body's ability to thwart inflammation and the disease process (Gruber, 2013). Gruber (2013) claimed sleep is necessary for normal emotional functioning.

Sleep deprivation compromises an individual's capacity to regulate emotions (Walker, & van der Helm, 2009). This process can cause a cycle of sleep deprivation, lack of emotional regulation, increased stress which increases the inability to sleep, all of which interferes in psychological well being (Gruber, 2013). Colton and Altevogt (2006) claimed sleep loss is a common, yet ordinarily overlooked health problem for 50-70 million Americans. All of these individuals suffer consequences of cognitive functioning, although these losses are not always easily identifiable (Colton & Altevogt, 2006). Gross errors in judgment is one of the most common effects of sleep deprivation. Further, hypertension and obesity develop after years of chronic lack of sleep (Colton & Altevogt, 2006)

The Mechanisms of Modern Sleeping Pills
Breedlove et al., (2010) explained that benzodiazepines (z-drugs) bind to GABA receptors and disengages the activity of some neurons. GABA is an inhibitory neurotransmitter and benzodiazepines bind to at least five of these receptors (Thornton, 2010). After binding to these receptor sites, the inactivity of neurons has an effect on surrounding neurons, which calms the nervous system, and this results in the ability to fall asleep (Jerome, 2013).

Thornton (2010) explained that within the midbrain, humans have specialized neurons that can "trigger reflex behaviors" (para. 26). Normally, these are disengaged by the more intelligent forebrain. When people sleep, their forebrain sleeps as well, and they lose the capacity for self-restraint. This is not usually a problem because they are asleep. However, for individuals predisposed to parasomnia, sleep drugs can provoke the individual to engage in wakeful unrestrained actions. The problem is that these individuals are asleep and have no conscious awareness of their actions (Thornton, 2010).

Advantage and Limitation of Sleeping Pill Use for Insomnia

The advantage of sleep drugs is that they save individuals from the throes and negative effects of insomnia. Several limitations exist for the use of these pills: their addictive properties are well-documented and recently it was found that they can increase the risk of Alzheimer's (Jerome, 2013). Further, sleeping pills can cause parasomnia, which can lead to odd, dangerous, and unconscious behaviors (Thornton, 2010).


Breedlove, S. M., Watson, N. V., & Rosenzweig, M. R. (2010). Biological psychology: An introduction to behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. (6th ed.) Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers.

Burne, J. (2013, January 8). Is there any such thing as a SAFE sleeping pill?. Daily Mail. p. 25.

Colten, H. R., & Altevogt, B. M. (2006). Sleep disorders and sleep deprivation [electronic resource] : an unmet public health problem / Committee on Sleep Medicine and Research, Board on Health Sciences Policy ; Harvey R. Colten and Bruce M. Altevogt, editors. Washington, DC : Institute of Medicine : National Academies Press, c2006.

Gruber, R. (2013). Making Room for Sleep: The Relevance of Sleep to Psychology and the Rationale for Development of Preventative Sleep Education Programs for Children and Adolescents in the Community. Canadian Psychology, 54(1), 62-71. doi:10.1037/a0030936

Jung, C., Melanson, E., Frydendall, E., Perreault, L., Eckel, R., & Wright, K. (2011). Energy expenditure during sleep, sleep deprivation and sleep following sleep deprivation in adult humans. The Journal Of Physiology, 589(Pt 1), 235-244. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2010.197517

Kripke, D. F., Langer, R. D., & Kline, L. E. (2012) Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study. British Medical Journal Open 2(1) doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000850

Thornton, J. (2010). The weird & dangerous world of sleeping pills. Men's Health (10544836), 25(7), 146-153.

Walker, M. P., & van der Helm, E. (2009). Overnight therapy? The role of sleep in emotional brain processing. Psychological Bulletin, 135(5), 731–748.