Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung remain  two of the most influential psychologists in the psychodynamic  perspective.  After a significant investment in both a personal and  professional relationship, the two found irreconcilable differences in  their ideas and both permanently withdrew from the relationship.   Although many of the differences in their theories seem subtle, their  directions maintained wide differences that remained at odds, yet  supplied the psychological community with a rich bounty of theory which,  although highly criticized, remains some of the most applied theory and  therapy in contemporary psychology. 
Underlying Assumptions 
Sigmund  Freud 
Long before Sigmund Freud focused on  unconscious processes, philosophers and poets made it the topic of  discussion.  However, he was the first early psychologist to create  psychological theory based on this proposition (Westen, 1998).  Freud's  theory distinguished psychoanalysis from other perspectives during his  time because of its focus on unconscious mental processes.  Feist and  Feist (2009) claims sex and aggression are its main basis.  Based on the  analysis of his own dreams and case studies of his patients, Freud  separated the religious and philosophical underpinnings of his time from  unconscious human thought processes, and created a theory based on  their dynamic motivational influence  on behavior (Feist & Feist,  2009).      
Central to Freud's theory are three  fundamental elements of the human psyche: the conscious, preconscious,  and unconscious.  The conscious mind is that of which humans are aware  at any given time, and consists of memories, thoughts, fantasies,  sensations, and present perceptions (Boeree, 1997).  The preconscious is  associated with the modern concept of available memory that can be  readily brought to mind.  Freud considered the unconscious the dominant  influence of human thought processes and behavior (Boeree, 1997).  It  contains human drives and instincts that originate within the  unconscious, and censors memories and emotions too difficult to maintain  in conscious awareness (Boeree, 1997).  Freud considered the  unconscious the source of all human motivation or drives.  These three  levels of consciousness are used as representations or hypothetical  constructs of processes and locations within the mind.  
Carl  Gustav Jung 
Jung was originally a colleague of  Freud, but because of differences in their perspective of psychoanalytic  theory, he established a separate theory of personality called  analytical psychology.  Jung's theory is based on the idea that the  human psyche resides in the world and significantly influences human  thought processes and behavior (Feist & Feist, 2009). 
Alternative  to Freud's psychoanalysis, which determines human motivation as the  exclusive rendering of the personal unconscious, Jung believed human  motivation is provoked by the collective unconscious as well as our  repressed experiences.  The collective unconscious is a composite that  we inherit from our ancestors as well as our repressed experiences.   Jung referred to the highly developed features of the collective  unconscious as archetypes, the most inclusive of which is the idea of  self-realization (Feist & Feist, 2009).  He believed  self-realization could be accomplished only by balancing opposing  personality forces within the self and consequently his theory is based  on the action of this internalized opposition.  Jung understood people  are both conscious and unconscious, rational and irrational, introverted  and extroverted, all of which are influenced by experience,  expectations, and goals.  The integration of these opposing forces would  create wholeness (Feist & Feist, 2010). 
Jung  perceived the unconscious as a source of healing and development in  individuals while acknowledging the collective conscious, and the  mysterious nature of the soul, and developed a distinctive approach that  incorporated dreams, archetypes, mythology, and folklore (Feist &  Feist, 2009).  He was compelled to explore the mysterious depths of the  human unconscious and its beauty (Jung, Hull, & De Laszlo, 1990).   Whereas Jung placed immediate importance on the collective unconscious  as an integral part of human motivation, Freud considered inherited  constitutions and inclinations only when other explanations failed. 
Determinism  versus Free Will 
Freud 
Freud's  psychoanalysis was decidedly deterministic.  He believed a large  percentage of 
human behavior had its roots in past events and  early childhood experiences, most of which were unidentifiable by  conscious awareness (Feist & Feist, 2009).  Freud thought if humans  were unaware of the directives that motivated them, they were destined  to live a life controlled by unconscious strivings.  He also thought  people have an illusory belief that they are, in fact, in control of  their destinies, but stated, "the ego is not master in its own house"  (Freud, 1933, p. 143 as cited by Feist & Feist, 2009).  Most people  tend to believe they have access to free will, the ability to make  conscious decisions, and the capacity to be motivated by both internal  and external goals, but Freud believed humans are destined to follow  internal unknown directives created in the past, and destined to  influence the most significant behaviors throughout the life span. 
Carl  Jung 
The artist is not a person endowed with free  will who seeks his own ends, but one who allows art to realize its  purposes through him. As a human being he may have moods and a will and  personal aims, but as an artist he is "man" in a higher sense - he is  'collective man,' a vehicle and moulder of the unconscious psychic life  of mankind (Jung, 1933). 
Jung perceived the  complexity of humans in their opposing poles.  He did not believe that  the will of humans was necessarily free and unencumbered, nor did he  have Freud's oppressive deterministic view.  He viewed human motivation  as a composition of conscious thoughts, the personal unconscious, and  traces of evolutionary memory derived from ancestral past.  However,  Jung did not believe, as did Freud, humans are destined to behave and  think according to early childhood experiences.  Jung thought people  were influenced by the collective consciousness of humankind, unlike the  exclusively personal directives of Freud's theory, and per se, he  believed humans could participate with their collective selves toward  the goal of self-realization. 
Analysis of Self Awareness 
Freud  
Freud theorized unconscious directives, of which  they have neither awareness nor control, motivate humans (Feist &  Feist, 2009).  He insisted human behavior was motivated primarily by the  unconscious, which embodies drives, urges, and instincts, and  encourages nearly all human words, feelings, actions, and religious and  spiritual experiences mostly beyond the control of the mind.  According  to Feist and Feist (2009), although individuals may be aware of   observable behavior, they are often not aware of the mental processes  contributing to such behavior.  He thought all of human motivation was  deeply embedded in the unconscious, and these unobservable directives  were the primary influence of behavior.  Freud's deterministic view held  individuals to a destiny produced early in childhood with little room  for personal goals, and the influence of the external environment (Feist  & Feist, 2009). 
Jung 
Jung believed the  purpose of life was self-actualization, and the self was a composite of  the conscious and the unconscious mind, which manifested in opposing  forces seeking balance within the human psyche.  Jung thought the ideal  of self-realization existed within the collective unconscious of all  people, although its actualization was seldom realized (Feist &  Feist, 2009).   To reach self-realization, people must face the duality  that manifested as the darker side of human nature, and ultimately  confront the anima or animus.  Because Jung believed in the singular  purpose of self-actualization, he concerned himself with both conscious  and unconscious motives for behavior.  Human motivation was a  composition of the collective conscious, personal unconscious, and  traces of evolutionary memory and as such, Jung understood people made  choices, worked toward goals along with motivation from forces generated  in childhood.  Jung defined influences other than those motivated from  exclusively intrinsic directives (Feist & Feist, 2009). 
Conclusion  
On some of the central assumptions of psychodynamic  theory, such as levels of consciousness and the influence of mental  life, both Freud and Jung have influenced significantly modern  psychology, contemporary secular thought, and self-understanding.   Psychology continues to integrate the ideas of these two psychodynamic  theorists into the scientific community, even though some of their  theories fall short of addressing the contemporary understanding of  human thought and its processes.  Although both men were originally  rooted in Freud's psychoanalysis, differences in perspectives separated  them and their two distinct psychodynamic theories.  Although these  differences were many, perhaps the most disparate was their distinct  view of the human psyche: Freud's internal unconscious directives versus  Jung's universal collective unconscious.  Both men and their theories  continue to influence psychology and secular thought with their ideas of  energy as it influences and becomes human thought and behavior. 
References 
Boeree, C. G.  (1997). Sigmund Freud. My Webspace Files. Retrieved April 27, 2011,  from             http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/freud.html 
Feist,  J. & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of personality (7th ed.). New  York, NY: McGraw Hill. 
Freud, S. (1953). Symptoms, inhibitions,  and anxiety. (In J. Strachey (Ed. and Trans.), The            standardedition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud.  London:         Hogarth Press. 
Jung, C. G. (1933). Modern man in  search of a soul. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World. 
Jung,  C. G., Hull, R. F., & De Laszlo, L. V. (1990). Psyche and symbol.  Princeton, NJ: Princeton             University Press. 
Westen,  D. (1998). The scientific legacy of Sigmund Freud: toward a  psychodynamically             informed psychological science.  Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 333-371. doi:             10.1037//0033-2909.124.3.333
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
 
Deborah Stone, Hi my name is Kelli French. I am in online classes at UOP and I really like your work when it comes to psychology. I reference everything I use of your papers. The only problem I am having when it comes to referencing your paper is the (blogspot) right before the .com. Is there any way that you can take out that word or put a different word in there to make your research more creditable, (I am not say is not creditable) but for my research at the college It needs to be scholarly articles which I am sure you can understand this issue. My papers are spot on, good grades good material is fantastic but the cite itself is not. Please see if you can fix this? Thank You Kelli French--frenchy65@email.phoenix.edu
ReplyDeleteHi Kelli,
ReplyDeleteBlogs aren't scholarly articles for school-related intents and purposes. My work is not peer-reviewed, and like any other blog, I can write what I please. It's great fun, and might stimulate an idea or two, but it is not in your best interest to reference my work in your papers, unless your instructor allows you to do that.
Some students review my references and get ideas from some of the scholarly works I have referenced.
Good luck in your class work!